Claude vs ChatGPT: which is faster?

Real breakdown, not a blended average: GPT models come out faster in every category measured here, comparing each side's best-fit model for the job rather than an arbitrary pairing.

Speed by category, best model on each side

For each category, this compares this site's own best-fit Claude pick against its best-fit GPT pick: the same "good fit" model each side would actually point you to, not an arbitrary pairing.

Category
Claude pick
GPT pick
Faster
Writing
Haiku 4.5: 2.0 s (243×)
GPT-5.6 Luna: 1.7 s (288×)
GPT-5.6 Luna
Reading
Opus 4.8: 11 s (675×)
GPT-5.6 Sol: 9.8 s (732×)
GPT-5.6 Sol
Solving
Sonnet 5: 3.8 s (711×)
GPT-5.6 Terra: 3.6 s (748×)
GPT-5.6 Terra
Coding
Sonnet 5: 2.4 s (375×)
GPT-5.6 Terra: 2.3 s (395×)
GPT-5.6 Terra
Editing
Haiku 4.5: 1.5 s (123×)
GPT-5.6 Luna: 1.0 s (182×)
GPT-5.6 Luna

"×" is the speed multiplier over a typical person doing the same task by hand: see how we measure → for the full method.

Why the pairing matters

Both providers ship a range of models, from quick everyday ones to slower specialists; pairing the wrong two against each other (a specialist Claude model against a quick GPT model, or vice versa) would distort the answer either way. The table above pairs each side's actual best fit for that category, which is the fair comparison. A different, mismatched pairing could easily flip individual rows.

Want a different pairing? Compare AI Models lets you pick any specific Claude model against any specific GPT model, on any task, and race that exact combination live.

These are per-category best-fit comparisons; for one blended average across every task and every model, see the full model comparison →. Prefer a plain-language answer for one specific job? Which model should I use? → Curious how the open-weight models stack up against these two? Paid vs open-source AI →